Classifying Arguments Activity: McDonald v. Chicago

(1 review) Write a Review
Available for immediate download after checkout.
Adding to cart… The item has been added

Classifying Arguments is a SCOTUS case study strategy in which students are given arguments from each side of a case and tasked with identifying whether each argument supports the petitioner or the respondent. 

In this classroom-ready activity, students will examine arguments from the Second Amendment case of McDonald v. Chicago. An answer key is also available for download.  

Additional details:  

Learn more about Street Law, Inc. professional development opportunities related to teaching SCOTUS cases in the classroom and more!

1 Review Hide Reviews Show Reviews

  • 5
    very worthwhile

    Posted by Michele Varner on Mar 17th 2022

    Using this in my classroom to reinforce other teaching materials