- Teaching activities, case background, decision summaries, and recommended resources for teaching about Miranda v. Arizon.
- Format: web link
- © 2002 Street Law, Inc. and the Supreme Court Historical Society
- Free for non-commercial educational use. Permissions questions? Email firstname.lastname@example.org
Ernesto Miranda was arrested after a crime victim identified him, but police officers questioning him did not inform him of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, or of his Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of an attorney. While he confessed to the crime, his attorney later argued that his confession should have been excluded from trial. The Supreme Court agreed, deciding that the police had not taken proper steps to inform Miranda of his rights.